After Mr. Chase’s termination, his attorney sent a correspondence marked ‘Confidential’ to Brothers, which included a legal assessment of the damages suffered by Mr. Chase at that time. It is unfortunate that Brothers would wrench portions of a confidential attorney communication out of context and misrepresent such communication for its own self-serving purposes. Mr. Chase’s attorney categorically denies the “go public” statement attributed to her, in addition to engaging in ‘extortion.’
Finally, there was no ‘sad admission’ by Mr. Chase of ‘misappropriating proprietary company data.’ In further retaliation against Mr. Chase’s whistleblowing activity, Brothers sued Mr. Chase in federal court (Brothers later voluntarily withdrew the lawsuit). Upon the advice of his attorney and to avoid further litigious bullying by Brothers, Mr. Chase voluntarily agreed not to copy, disseminate or otherwise distribute certain information on his home computer. Mr. Chase denies attempting to “sabotage” the company website.”
Leave a Reply